Kim Parker, Esq.

Attorney at law

Kim Parker, Esquire
Advocate for Justice | Legal Visionary

Kim Parker, a force in the legal world whose passion for justice is as fierce as her courtroom presence. With an impressive track record in bankruptcy, and personal injury law, Kim stands out not just for her legal prowess but for her unwavering commitment to her clients and their futures.

Before establishing the Law Office of Kim Parker, P.A., she honed her skills as an Attorney at the Law Offices of Norris C. Ramsey, P.A., where she navigated the labyrinthine legal system, litigating complex cases in both the Circuit and District Courts of Maryland. With numerous trials under her belt, she has emerged as a seasoned warrior in the legal arena, respected by peers and clients alike.

Kim’s legal journey began with a thirst for knowledge and justice. An alumna of the University of Baltimore School of Law, she earned her Juris Doctor in 1993, emphasizing her dedication to legal excellence. Her foundation was laid at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, where she graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice, consistently earning a spot on the Dean’s List. Before her academic pursuits, she served in the United States Army in 1985, infusing her practice with discipline, resilience, and a strong sense of duty.

At the heart of Kim’s practice lies her fervent belief in the power of advocacy. She asserts, “The fight for justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in my case, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity.” This poignant reminder fuels her determination and connects her deeply with her clients, understanding the emotional and financial stakes involved.

With 60% of her practice dedicated to personal injury, Kim approaches every case with strategic precision and a relentless pursuit of justice. She is admitted to practice in Maryland, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, and the District of Columbia, enabling her to advocate effectively for her clients across multiple jurisdictions.

Beyond the courtroom, Kim is deeply engaged in her community and profession. She is a proud member of the National Alliance of Antigua and Barbados and serves on the Board of the HOSEA Corporation, demonstrating her commitment to social justice and community empowerment. Additionally, she is an active member of the Maryland Bar Association, District of Columbia Bar Association, and Monumental Bar Association.

Whether you’re facing the complexities of bankruptcy, navigating the challenges of personal injury claims, or seeking expert counsel on business matters, Kim Parker is the advocate you need by your side. Her dynamic approach, coupled with her innovative strategies, ensures that every client receives the personalized attention and dedicated representation they deserve.

Discover the difference that a passionate attorney can make—connect with Kim Parker today. Your fight for justice starts here.

"The fight for justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in my case, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity."

Frank Serpico

EDUCATION

  • University of Baltimore School Of Law, J.D., 1993
  • John Jay College Of Criminal Law. B.S. Criminal Justice, Dean’s List, 1987
  • United States Army, 1985

PRACTICE AREAS

  • 50% dedicated to litigation.

ADMITTED TO PRACTICE

  • Maryland
  • United States District Court for the District of Maryland
  • District of Columbia

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

  • National Alliance Of Antigua And Barbados.
  • Board Member for the HOSEA Corporation.
  • Maryland Bar Association
  • District of Columbia Bar Association
  • Monumental Bar Association
https://aaattorneynetwork.com rel=”nofollow” title=”The African American Attorney Network”>The African American Attorney Network

Appellate Cases

Smith v. RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC., No. 0936, September Term, 2015 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. May 19, 2016).

Hyperlink to Case: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16442980383879621689&hl=en&as_sdt=80006

Statement of Case: Kim Parker won reversal of an order granting summary judgment on behalf of her client in a premises liability case against Rite Aid Corporation. The Court found, and rightfully so, that “In conclusion, we cannot say that “a fair minded jury” could not, based on the record, that Rite Aid breached its duty to Ms. Smith, and that she was not contributory negligent and did not assume the risk. The circuit court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Rite Aid”.

Nickens v. MT. VERNON REALTY GROUP, LLC, 41 A.3d 570, 425 Md. 396 (2012)

Hyperlink to Case: https://www.courts.state.md.us/data/opinions/coa/2012/7a12.pdf

Statement of Case: Kim Parker and the Maryland Public Justice Center won reversal of the grant of a Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of a foreclosure purchaser and foreclosure attorney. The Court concluded that a property owner must exercise a similar reasonableness in the disposition of an occupant’s personal property that remains within the dwelling. The published decision resulted in the Maryland legislature, reversing a century old law that permitted Maryland landlords to use peaceable self-help to evict residential tenants. (See Real Property Article 7-112 [or 113], 8-216, and 8A-1102 (Effective June 1, 2013)

SUTTON-WITHERSPOON v. SAFE MANAGEMENT, INC., No. 2589, September Term, 2016 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Feb. 26, 2019)

Hyperlink to Case: https://mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/cosa/2019/2589s16.pdf

Statement of Case: The firm, along with co-counsel, obtained reversal, in a published opinion, of the Circuit Court of Baltimore’s grant of the Baltimore Ravens Motion for Summary Judgment. Ms. Parker’s and Mr. Iamele’s clients were injured when they were trampled at a parade celebrating the 2013 Baltimore Ravens Superbowl Win. The Court of Special Appeals found that it was well settled in Maryland law that one who invites another upon his premises owes the invitee the duty of exercising reasonable care to see that the premises is reasonably safe and that storekeepers have a duty to protect against possible occurrences. The court said the defendants “solicited” the extraordinarily large crowd and despite having the ability to handle large crowds, it permitted the crowd to “become too dense for proper control or safe exit.” The Court also said that the trial court had not properly considered the defendants’ argument that their injuries resulted from a danger that was reasonably foreseeable because the defendants decided to host an “unticketed” and highly publicized Super Bowl celebration that would draw large crowds and then allegedly failed to provide adequate crowd controls.

Contact Us

If you or someone you care have been treated wrongly or injured, let a knowledgeable, experienced attorney will guide you and fight for your case. Don’t miss out on the justice you deserve. Contact us today at 410-234-2621. Let’s talk about your needs and how we can help.

Contact Us Now